Accessory nerve injury.
Copyright policy )Accessory nerve injury.
This article discusses a Supreme Court judgment involving an injury to the spinal accessory nerve which occurred during the excision of a lymph node mass in the posterior triangle of the neck.1 In this case, the medical practitioner was found to have been negligent for failing to diagnose the nerve injury in the postoperative period, and not for the actual injury to the nerve during the procedure.
Adult, Risk Management, Accessory Nerve Injuries, Australia, Abscess, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Shoulder Pain, General Surgery, Humans, Female, Family Practice, Intraoperative Complications, Neck
Adult, Risk Management, Accessory Nerve Injuries, Australia, Abscess, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Shoulder Pain, General Surgery, Humans, Female, Family Practice, Intraoperative Complications, Neck
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!