
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 1657205
Data published during the latter part of 1980s have shown that the natural history of gastrointestinal cancers can be influenced by treatment. This was further confirmed in esophageal cancers, for which many phase II studies have shown that chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy can induce major responses before surgery. Trials demonstrating a survival benefit are needed. Gastric cancers were confirmed to be sensitive to chemotherapy. Treatment based on combinations of fluorouracil, methotrexate, doxorubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin have shown high response rates (FAMTX [fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate], EAP [etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin], ELF [etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil]) and a survival benefit (FAMTX). Adjuvant treatment after surgery using the FAM (fluorouracil, epirubicin, methotrexate) regimen has failed to improve survival. The prognosis for other cancers remains dismal. When all types of gastrointestinal cancers except colon cancers are reviewed, current data indicate that chemotherapy should not be recommended outside the confines of prospective studies.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Esophageal Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles, Adenocarcinoma, Combined Modality Therapy, Cancérologie, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Humans, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Esophageal Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles, Adenocarcinoma, Combined Modality Therapy, Cancérologie, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Humans, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
