Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Management of esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary neoplasms.

Authors: Bleiberg, Harry;

Management of esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary neoplasms.

Abstract

Data published during the latter part of 1980s have shown that the natural history of gastrointestinal cancers can be influenced by treatment. This was further confirmed in esophageal cancers, for which many phase II studies have shown that chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy can induce major responses before surgery. Trials demonstrating a survival benefit are needed. Gastric cancers were confirmed to be sensitive to chemotherapy. Treatment based on combinations of fluorouracil, methotrexate, doxorubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin have shown high response rates (FAMTX [fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate], EAP [etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin], ELF [etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil]) and a survival benefit (FAMTX). Adjuvant treatment after surgery using the FAM (fluorouracil, epirubicin, methotrexate) regimen has failed to improve survival. The prognosis for other cancers remains dismal. When all types of gastrointestinal cancers except colon cancers are reviewed, current data indicate that chemotherapy should not be recommended outside the confines of prospective studies.

Country
Belgium
Keywords

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Esophageal Neoplasms, Liver Neoplasms, Sciences bio-médicales et agricoles, Adenocarcinoma, Combined Modality Therapy, Cancérologie, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Humans, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?