
This work presents characteristics of categorical data, their presentation and possible models of statistical analysis. There are two types of categorical data; nominal, where categories are equally valued (i.e. we can measure them only in terms of whether individual items belong to some distinctively different categories) and ordinal, where categories allow to rank order on some scale of measurement. Categorical data are non-numeric by nature, but could be numerically presented and analyzed anyway. Although the information value of categorical data is well below the respective information value of numerical, practically there's no study where their analysis wouldn't be of importance. Numerically, the categorical data can be presented via frequencies (absolute number of items belonging to the category) or their proportion (percentage) in the sample. Adequate graphical presentation goes with pie charts or percentage stacked bars charts. The statistical analysis of categorical data most often is done on contingency tables. The type of the analysis depends on the relation between samples from which the data are drowning. If the samples are independent, the analysis would be performed using difference of proportion test, chi2 test or Fisher exact test. The limitations and suitability for application of the three is discussed. If the samples are dependent, the choice goes to McNemar chi2 test (2 samples) or Cochrane's Q test 8more than 2 samples). The conclusions from the aforementioned analyses could be drowned only in terms of significant or nonsignificant relations between the rows and columns in the contingency tables. In the need to measure the level of relations between categorical data, two types of measures are defined: relative risk and odds ratio, which can both be calculated only in 2x2 contingency tables. Relative risk is a ratio of two proportions (suitable only in prospective studies), whether odds ratio measures ratio between odds in two groups (could be calculated both in prospective and retrospective studies). All the aforementioned analyses are well documented with calculations on data collected in biomedical studies.
Risk, statistical analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Statistics as Topic, Odds Ratio, Humans, categorical data
Risk, statistical analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Statistics as Topic, Odds Ratio, Humans, categorical data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
