
pmid: 16448271
handle: 20.500.12418/10883
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) on nasal volume using acoustic rhinometric methods. Two groups of subjects were used in the study. Group 1 consisted of 10 subjects (mean age 12.30 +/- 0.82 years) who were treated with RME, and group 2 consisted of 10 subjects (mean age 18.70 +/- 2.54 years) who were treated by SARME. In both groups, all cases had a maxillary width deficiency with bilateral crossbites. Nasal volume records were taken by the same otorhinolaryngologist with an AR device. AR recordings were performed for each patient with and without the use of a decongestant. The first record was taken before expansion, and the second record was taken at the end of retention. The data for both groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test. The nasal volume showed a significant increase in both the RME and the SARME groups (P <.05). The measurement with the use of decongestant was similar to that without use of decongestant on the both groups (P <.05), but the different increments in nasal volume between the RME and the SARME groups were not statistically significant. Although the mean ages between the RME and the SARME groups were different, the increase in nasal volume was similar in both groups.
WOS: 000234550900011
PubMed ID: 16448271
Male, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Palatal Expansion Technique, surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion, Adolescent, acoustic rhinometry, Nose, Statistics, Nonparametric, 616, rapid maxillary expansion, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Child
Male, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Palatal Expansion Technique, surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion, Adolescent, acoustic rhinometry, Nose, Statistics, Nonparametric, 616, rapid maxillary expansion, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
