
The test formulation of controlled release diltiazem pellets was evaluated in vivo, in comparison with Herbesser SR. Six healthy volunteers participated in the study, conducted according to a randomized, two-way crossover study design. The preparations were compared using the pharmacokinetic parameters plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0- infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) were estimated from the plasma concentration-time profiles for each volunteer. The test formulation was found to be comparable with the Herbesser SR in the extent of bioavailability but differ in the rate of absorption, the test formulation being less sustained. No lag time was observed in any of the volunteers indicating that both formulations started to release their drug content immediately upon rupture of the capsule but in sustained manner. Moreover, the values of pharmacokinetic parameters obtained were comparable to those reported in the literature.
Adult, Male, Cross-Over Studies, Biological Availability, Capsules, Reference Standards, Drug Administration Schedule, Diltiazem, Therapeutic Equivalency, Verapamil, Area Under Curve, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Antihypertensive Agents, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Half-Life
Adult, Male, Cross-Over Studies, Biological Availability, Capsules, Reference Standards, Drug Administration Schedule, Diltiazem, Therapeutic Equivalency, Verapamil, Area Under Curve, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Antihypertensive Agents, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Half-Life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
