Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The significance of soluble CD138 in diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies.

Authors: V, Maisnar; M, Tousková; M, Tichý; J, Krejsek; L, Chrobák; J, Voglová; J, Malý;

The significance of soluble CD138 in diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies.

Abstract

Report is summary of the results of study designed to ascertain the significance of soluble CD138 (sCD138) assessment in patients with different monoclonal gammopathies. Previous studies have shown that sCD138 is shed from the surface of myeloma cells into serum and that this marker is a new independent prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma. In presented study was evaluated serum sCD138 level in 14 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and in 17 patients with multiple myeloma (MM), all MM patients were treated by high-dose chemotherapy regimen with subsequent autologous transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. To determine the sCD138 level we used a rapid and simple ELISA procedure. The mean serum sCD138 level of patients with MGUS was 32 ng/ml (range: 5-128). Soluble CD138 levels were elevated in the sera of 10 out of 17 (59%) multiple myeloma patients, the mean baseline sCD138 concentration was 1542 ng/ml (range: 10-17300). In spite of small number of patients the difference between MGUS and MM group was highly statistically significant (p<0.001). Multiple myeloma patients with high level of sCD138 at diagnosis (cut-off value: 500 ng/ml) had worse prognosis despite of good response to chemotherapy in some of them (p=0.029). It seems that determination of sCD138 can be recommended as a helpful and reliable marker for differential diagnosis as well as prognosis of monoclonal gammopathies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Syndecans, Paraproteinemias, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Female, Proteoglycans, Syndecan-1, Multiple Myeloma, Biomarkers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!