Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evaluation of the internal mammary nodes by lymphoscintigraphy and ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer].

Authors: T, Michigishi; K, Nakajima; N, Shuke; T, Miyauchi; I, Kuji; T, Aburano; N, Tonami; +3 Authors

[Evaluation of the internal mammary nodes by lymphoscintigraphy and ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer].

Abstract

The efficacy of lymphoscintigraphy and ultrasonography was evaluated in the detection of internal mammary lymph node (IMN) metastases in patients with breast cancer. On histological examination of IMN, 10 patients had metastases (positive group) and 47 did not (negative group). On lymphoscintigraphy, lack of uptake in the parasternal region of the affected side was classified as abnormal. The frequency of this abnormal finding was not significantly different between both groups. On sonography, the thickness of the sonolucent internal mammary area was measured. The thickness of the affected side was 6 mm or more in two patients of the positive group and only one of the negative group. A thickness of over 6 mm on the affected side was statistically significant (p less than 0.05). The difference in thickness between the affected side and the healthy side was 3 mm or more in four patients of the positive group, and was less than 3 mm in all patients of the negative group. A difference in thickness of more than 3 mm between the two sides was extremely significant (p less than 0.001). In conclusion, sonography is valuable in detecting IMN metastases, while lymphoscintigraphy is not useful. Sonography is recommended as an efficient diagnostic modality for IMN metastases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Lymph Nodes, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Imaging, Aged, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!