Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Squamous intraepithelial lesion-microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy.

Authors: H, Robova; L, Rob; M, Pluta; J, Kacirek; M, Halaska; P, Strnad; D, Schlegerova;

Squamous intraepithelial lesion-microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to assess proper management of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and microinvasive carcinoma during and after pregnancy, to assess risks of punch biopsy and conization in pregnancy and to assess regression, persistence and risk of progression with low-grade (L) and high-grade (H) SIL.We carried out a prospective study of 167 pregnant women from our colposcopic unit who were referred to us for abnormal cytological findings between 1997 and 2002. The diagnosis of precancerosis was verified in all of the women by punch biopsy, suspect microinvasive carcinoma needle or LETZ conization up to the 20th week of pregnancy. All women were followed-up during the pregnancy and 24 months after their deliveries.In 23 women with suspect early invasion we performed conization during the pregnancy (weeks 13-23). There were six cases (26.1%) of microinvasive carcinoma and 17 cases (73.9%) of HSIL. One pregnancy aborted two days after the conization. No other obstetrical complications were recorded and there were no premature deliveries. Sixty-two women with HSIL were only followed-up during their pregnancy. We observed complete regression of HSIL during the study in 14 patients (22.6%), regression to LSIL in 17 patients (27.4%), persistence in 25 patients (40.3%) and progression to microcarcinoma in six cases (9.7%). Eighty-two patients were followed up for LSIL. Complete regression of LSIL was observed during the study in 40 cases (48.8%), persistence in 24 cases (29.2%) and progression to HSIL in 18 cases (22.0%).For LSIL and HSIL during pregnancy the above follow-up is a sufficient and safe protocol. Suspect microinvasive carcinoma should be treated by conization, which is a safe procedure until the 24th week of pregnancy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Remission Induction, Conization, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervix Uteri, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Colposcopy, Pregnancy, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Disease Progression, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research