Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Perioperative bioelectrical impedence analysis in neurosurgery.

Authors: Abdelazeem A, El-Dawlatly;

Perioperative bioelectrical impedence analysis in neurosurgery.

Abstract

The use of bioelectrical impedence (BI) measurement to assess body composition has recently attracted the attention of anesthesiologists. Analysis of BI provides a non-invasive method to quantify fluid distribution in different body compartments. This study was designed to assess whether BI analysis reflects fluid depletion in neurosurgical patients with moderate blood loss. Six adult male patients scheduled for elective craniotomy under general anesthesia were studied. Exclusion criteria included patients with cardio-respiratory disease. BI analysis was performed at three stages, A, day before operation, B, during surgery and C, on the first postoperative day. Total body resistivity was measured by BI analysis with a four-terminal portable impedence analyzer. At each frequency, impedence was calculated as resistance (Rx)2 + reactance (Rc)2. The mean values of total body water (TBW) at stages A, B and C were 39.8 L (range: 33.1-46.7 L), 43.2 L (range: 33.1-66.2 L) and 36.8 L (range: 22.4-36.3 L) respectively with significant differences (P<0.05). The impedence at the three frequencies during stages A, B and C showed significant differences (P<0.05). In conclusion, we have found that in male neurosurgical patients multiple frequency BI measurements has reflected fluid balance perioperatively. Whether this observation remains true for other surgical procedures with massive blood loss, yet to be further investigated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Body Water, Body Composition, Electric Impedance, Humans, Body Fluid Compartments, Anesthesia, General, Middle Aged, Neurosurgical Procedures

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!