Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Microalbuminuria and pregnancy. Is microalbuminuria predictive of pregnancy toxemia?].

Authors: E, Bouton; J, Pichot; B, Poggi; F, Poloce; J M, Thoulon; D, Raudrant;

[Microalbuminuria and pregnancy. Is microalbuminuria predictive of pregnancy toxemia?].

Abstract

Several authors have suggested that estimating the levels of microalbuminuria will help in early screening for pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this work has been to look for the absence of microalbuminuria in normal pregnancies and to work out its predictive value for the risk of toxaemia of pregnancy when it does appear. The study was carried out on 257 women of whom 43 were controls and 214 women who were pregnant and had neither diabetes nor hypertension and had no kidney infections. The samples of urine were gathered in a 12 hour period of night and those that gave a positive reaction for albumin were rejected. RIA techniques were used to work out the levels of albuminuria and these were confirmed by immunoassay. We have compared microalbuminuria, the relationship between urine albumin and creatinine and the clearance of albumin in relationship to albuminuria (as defined by the relationship of albumin and creatinine clearance). We have calculated the sensitivity and the specificity and the prognostic value both positive and negative for these four parameters. Our results show that in a normal pregnancy there should not be any microalbuminuria, and on the other hand that if microalbuminuria does appear according to the four parameters studied, they are all equally sensitive for predicting pre-eclampsia. The relative clearance of albumin from the urine seems to be the most interesting parameter as far as we are concerned, and it could lead to early screening for toxaemia.

Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Decision Trees, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pregnancy Complications, Pre-Eclampsia, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Pregnancy, Creatinine, Albuminuria, Humans, Mass Screening, False Positive Reactions, Female, France, False Negative Reactions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!