
The Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) has been developed in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in which only conventional anti-rheumatic treatments were used. It has extensively been validated to monitor disease activity in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. The study of Vander Cruyssen and colleagues showed that the DAS28 correlated best with the decisions of rheumatologists to increase the infliximab dose because of insufficient response. This result once more confirms the validity of the DAS28 to monitor disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to titrate treatment with biologicals.
Contains fulltext : 47313.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
UMCN 4.2: Chronic inflammation and autoimmunity, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Reproducibility of Results, N4i 1: Pathogenesis and modulation of inflammation, Severity of Illness Index, Infliximab, Autoimmune Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cohort Studies, N4i 4: Auto-immunity, transplantation and immunotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Antirheumatic Agents, Commentary, Humans, NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions, Drug Monitoring
UMCN 4.2: Chronic inflammation and autoimmunity, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Reproducibility of Results, N4i 1: Pathogenesis and modulation of inflammation, Severity of Illness Index, Infliximab, Autoimmune Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cohort Studies, N4i 4: Auto-immunity, transplantation and immunotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Antirheumatic Agents, Commentary, Humans, NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions, Drug Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
