
With the objective of describing the participation and quantity (g) in the intake of leguminous in two geographical areas (metropolitan and rural), three surveys were re-analyzed, in them 571 subjects (148 scholars and 443 mothers) described their intake by the 24-hour dietary recall method. For the above mentioned, descriptive measures and confidence intervals were calculated with a reliability of 95% (IC 95%), the comparison of the intake among groups was carried out by t test and analysis of variance. 36.4% of the subjects consumes leguminous dry; differences were observed in the consumption of leguminous for geographical area; leguminous dry (p = 0.03) and green (p = 0.04). Of the group of leguminous, the dry ones represent the best resource to cover the energy necessities and nutritious; the biggest contribution to the daily recommendation is for folic acid, magnesium, thiamine, protein, phosphorus, iron and zinc. The contribution of the leguminous ones to the recommendations of nutrients was different for geographical area (p < 0.01). The low cost and the nutritional contribution of the leguminous dry, especially to the daily recommendations of folic acid and proteins are aspects to consider in their promotion.
Adult, Male, Rural Population, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Nutritional Requirements, Fabaceae, Feeding Behavior, Colombia, Middle Aged, Diet Surveys, Diet Records, Diet, Cross-Sectional Studies, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Female, Child, Energy Intake, Nutritive Value
Adult, Male, Rural Population, Analysis of Variance, Adolescent, Nutritional Requirements, Fabaceae, Feeding Behavior, Colombia, Middle Aged, Diet Surveys, Diet Records, Diet, Cross-Sectional Studies, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Female, Child, Energy Intake, Nutritive Value
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
