Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Phacoemulsification combined with cyclophotocoagulation].

Authors: P, Janknecht;

[Phacoemulsification combined with cyclophotocoagulation].

Abstract

Cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification procedures may be combined to treat patients with glaucoma and cataract. To the best of our knowledge data concerning this combination have not been published as yet.28 eyes (23 patients, mean age 78.1 +/- 7.6 years) were operated upon between 9.04.2002 and 29.06.2004. Patients were compared to a group with phacoemulsification alone.A median of 15 laser flashes (duration 2000 ms, power 1750 mW) were applied. Complications at discharge from hospital (and after 6 weeks) were: corneal oedema 18 % (4.0 %), fibrinous reaction 25 % (7.1 %), hyphaema 7.1 % (0 %), 1 decentred IOL, 7.1 % capsular tear. Visual acuity increased statistically significantly from 0.3 to 0.5. Mean intraocular pressure decreased statistically significantly from 23.7 +/- 5.6 mmHg to 16.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg after 166 days. Success rate was 76 % after 6 weeks and 85.7 % after 166 days. The mean number of antiglaucomatous drugs could be reduced from 1.6 to 1.1 after 166 days. In the control group there was a transient corneal edema in 14.3 % (7.1 % cornea guttata), other complications were not found.The combination of cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification is as successful as other combinations of cataract and glaucoma surgery with a similar or lower complication rates. Cyclophotocoagulation is cost efficient, can be repeated and is adaptable to the intraocular pressure.

Keywords

Phacoemulsification, Visual Acuity, Glaucoma, Cataract Extraction, Recovery of Function, Light Coagulation, Combined Modality Therapy, Cataract, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!