Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evaluation of clinical necessity of gastrointestinal decompression after excision and anastomosis of lower digestive tract].

Authors: Wen-zhang, Lei; Gao-ping, Zhao; Ka, Li; Zhong, Cheng; Tian-cai, Wang;

[Evaluation of clinical necessity of gastrointestinal decompression after excision and anastomosis of lower digestive tract].

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical necessity of postoperative gastrointestinal decompression after operation on lower digestive tract.Three hundred and sixty-eight patients who required excision and anastomosis of lower digestive tract were randomly divided into two groups, with or without receiving gastrointestinal decompression after operation. Clinical therapeutic efficacy and complications were compared between two groups.The volume of gastrointestinal suction ranged from 10 ml to 520 ml each day after operation, and was less on the first day than those on the second and the third day after operation in decompression group. There was no significant difference in the average girth between two groups before and after operation. The average girths were shorter before operation than those after operation in two groups (P 0.05). The complication rate was significantly higher in decompression group than that in non-decompression group (28% vs. 8.2%, P< 0.001). The incidence of pharyngolaryngitis was up to 23.1% in decompression group. There was no difference in hospital stay between the two groups after operation.The recovery of patients who receive excision and anastomosis of lower digestive tract will benefit from non-gastrointestinal decompression.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Anastomosis, Surgical, Lower Gastrointestinal Tract, Middle Aged, Decompression, Surgical, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!