Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration.

Authors: Zvi, Schwartz; Erez, Nasazky; Barbara D, Boyan;

Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration.

Abstract

Increased surface roughness of dental implants enhances the process of osseointegration. It increases bone conduction and increases BIC in all types of bone, resulting in elevated removal torque values. Surface roughness elevated the CSR of implants implanted in adverse conditions as augmented ridges and sinuses and areas of poor bone, such as the posterior maxilla, and in some cases abolished the deleterious effect of smoking. A growing number of clinical studies suggest that early and immediate loading of rough-surfaced implants may lead to predictable osseointegration. However, it is important to note that these studies provide short-term results based on radiographic observation and clinical mobility only. Before we adopt new surgical and prosthetic guidelines, longer and broader studies are needed. Most recent research has examined the effect of surface roughness on bone healing around implants in vivo and the influence of surface roughness on osteoblasts in vitro. In a study just published, it was found that changing the surface chemistry by submerging an implant in an isotonic sodium chloride solution following acid etching to avoid contamination with molecules from the atmosphere significantly increased osteoblast differentiation in vitro and BIC in vivo. This finding may lead us to a new era in dental implants.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Implants, Osteoblasts, Dental Prosthesis Design, Osseointegration, Surface Properties, Dental Etching, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Cell Adhesion, Animals, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!