Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Trichiasis among close relatives, central Ethiopia.

Authors: Muluken, Melese; Wondu, Alemayehu; Alemayehu, Worku;

Trichiasis among close relatives, central Ethiopia.

Abstract

Active trachoma is known to cluster in close contacts, such as mother and child and between siblings, but we do not know the pattern for trichiasis. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine if there is as much trichiasis as active trachoma within families having close contact. This information will be helpful in designing intervention strategies. Trichiasis patients that presented for surgery were interviewed for the presence or absence of trichiasis in the current nuclear family, their parent/s, brother/s, sister/s, aunt/s or uncle/s. Of the 739 trichiasis patients interviewed, 78% were women. Fourteen percent of trichiasis cases had at least one nuclear family member with the same condition, and 20.0% had other relative/s (parent/s, brother/ s, sister/s, aunt/s or uncle/s) with trichiasis. Trichiasis increases in parallel with the increase in family size of the index case (c2 for trend = 70.6; P < 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of affected nuclear family members of the index cases were female members. In the relative with trichiasis, 92.8% of cases were parents, sisters and brothers of the index cases. Out of these, the majority (70%) were mothers and sisters. The chance of a female trichiasis patient having another relative with trichiasis is 70%. The chance of the mother/sister/s of a male trichiasis patient being trichiasis patients themselves is 80%, while that of the father/brother/s is 20% (c2=21.88; P < 0.001). If a female has trichiasis there is a 70% chance of her mother/sister/s, and 30% chance of the father/ brother/s (c2 = 27.52; P <0.001) also being trichiasis patients.

Keywords

Adult, Family Health, Male, Trachoma, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Cross-Sectional Studies, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Ethiopia, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!