Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Osteomyelitis of the carpus and metacarpus].

Authors: A, Eisenschenk; K, Bauwens; R, Böttcher; D, Stengel;

[Osteomyelitis of the carpus and metacarpus].

Abstract

Because of the low prevalence, there is poor evidence on the effective management of bone and joint infections of the carpus and metacarpus. We therefore studied the outcomes of patients undergoing surgical treatment at our department.We conducted a retrospective study on all patients operated on because of osteomyelitis of the carpus and metacarpus between January 1998 and June 2004. Main study endpoint were the infection control rate at end of treatment and at time of follow-up.Of eleven subjects (nine men, two women) with a median age of 43 years (range, 19 to 79 years) serial débridement with temporary wound closure and surgical fixation proved successful in ten cases. We identified causative pathogens in ten cases (S. aureus: n = 3, P. aeruginosa: n = 3, mixed: n = 4) by intraoperative biopsy. Eight subjects received local or free tissue flaps. A 73 year old man died in hospital. Follow-up information was available for eight patients after a median of 19.5 months (range: 3 to 61 months). Seven of them did not show signs of recurrent infection.Adhering to accepted standards of treating osteomyelitis, satisfactory control rates in carpal and metacarpal infection can be achieved while salvaging the hand.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Osteomyelitis, Occlusive Dressings, Middle Aged, Staphylococcal Infections, Surgical Flaps, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Postoperative Complications, Debridement, Humans, Methylmethacrylates, Female, Pseudomonas Infections, Hospital Mortality, Gentamicins, Metacarpus, Carpal Bones, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!