Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessment of direct fluorescent antibody technique in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually transmitted infections clinics.

Authors: Zygmunt, Dajek; Zenobia, Selibórska; Elzbieta, Wiecko-Jankowska;

Assessment of direct fluorescent antibody technique in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually transmitted infections clinics.

Abstract

To compare Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) test with Ligase Chain Reaction (LCR).Urethral (in males) of cervical swabs, and samples of urine were obtained from 356 consecutive patients of the Institute of Venerology (220 males and 136 females). Among them there were 96 sexual couples. In 74 finally evaluated and analysed sexual couples at least one sample from one partner was positive in at least one performed test.LCR-urethra was positive in 60 out of 65 males while LCR-urine and DFA-urethra were positive in 59 and 57 men respectively.Men infected with C. trachomatis were usually the first to seek medical care; their sex-partners come later. These findings suggest that DFA in males, which is only slightly less sensitive than LCR, should be recommended. Sex-partners of these men, symptomatic and asymptomatic, even with negative DFA-cervix should be given prophylactic treatment.

Keywords

Male, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct, Predictive Value of Tests, Ligase Chain Reaction, Humans, Chlamydia trachomatis, Female, Chlamydia Infections, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!