
Aim of the present study is to draw conclusions from published research regarding the positive-negative schizophrenia concept, and to try to present the opinion of supporters and critics of the concept in a balanced way. The historical background of the concept, from Reynolds and Jackson during the last century until today, is reviewed. After giving the definitions and presenting various instruments of evaluation, the question is discussed, how stable "negative" und "positive" psychopathological constellations are. Consideration of the results of research on the long-term time course of schizophrenia, as well as in genetics, biology und psychopharmacology, leads one to conclude, on the one hand that the positive-negative concept is relevant for clinical practice and research, but on the other hand that many of the present studies were not able to confirm a clear cut positive-negative dichotomy.
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Thinking, Hallucinations, Schizophrenia, Humans, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Delusions
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Thinking, Hallucinations, Schizophrenia, Humans, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Delusions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
