
A study on the quality of primary obstetric care in uncomplicated pregnancies carried out by means of a checklist revealed substandard factors in perinatal care in 71 out of 72 pregnancies. However there are many objections to the quality-control procedure. Some items on the original checklist had to be abandoned due to lack of evidence. In other items definitions and circumstances had not been properly considered and in some cases the patient's own wishes were responsible for a change in policy. The quality of the care delivered cannot be judged only by counting items on a checklist, but requires careful consideration of the situation and of the circumstances that led to the choices in perinatal care.
Obstetrics, Quality Control, Perinatal Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Humans, Female, Midwifery, Netherlands, Quality of Health Care
Obstetrics, Quality Control, Perinatal Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Humans, Female, Midwifery, Netherlands, Quality of Health Care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
