Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations.
Copyright policy )Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations.
This study evaluated the two-year clinical performance of two types of giomers (Beautifil, a surface reaction giomer and Reactmer, a full-reaction giomer), in occlusal (Class I) and cervical (Class V) cavities using the USPHS criteria. Forty-two cervical erosion and carious lesions were restored using Beautifil and Reactmer following manufacturer's instructions. Twenty occlusal cavities were restored with Beautifil. Fifteen patients (mean age 35, ranging in age from 20 to 50 years) participated in the study. The success rate for cervical Beautifil restorations after two years was 80%, while the success rate for cervical Reactmer restorations was 71%. Occlusal Beautifil restorations had a 100% success rate.
Adult, Fluorides, Time Factors, Humans, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Dental Restoration Failure, Middle Aged, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Composite Resins
Adult, Fluorides, Time Factors, Humans, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Dental Restoration Failure, Middle Aged, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Composite Resins
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).30 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!