Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Ductus venosus agenesis].

Authors: N, Durakovic; A, Azancot; D, Eurin; F, Menez; E, Vuillard; C, Garel; D, Luton; +1 Authors

[Ductus venosus agenesis].

Abstract

Congenital absence of the ductus venosus is a rare anomaly in the fetus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic features and outcome of the fetuses with ductus venosus agenesis.We describe 12 cases in the period between 1992 and 2004. The umbilical vein drained either into the right atrium directly (2 cases) or by the coronary sinus (1 case), or in the inferior vena cava (5 cases), or in the azygos vein (1 case), or in the portal vein (3 cases). Our data where analyzed with the cases published in the literature. Two groups of anastomoses where defined on the basis of the hemodynamic consequences: the group of extrahepatic anastomoses (53 cases) and the group of intrahepatic anastomoses (22 cases).In the group of extra hepatic anastomoses, cardiomegaly was the most common antenatal finding (39%), while in the intra hepatic group hydrops fetalis occurred most frequently (23%). Malformation rate was high in both groups (56% and 45%) and chromosomal anomalies where present in 9% of cases.Careful assessment of the umbilical venous return and the ductus venosus should be a part of examination of every fetus with cardiomegaly, polyhydramnios, ascites or hydrops. In case of absence of the ductus venosus a referral scan, a fetal echocardiography and a karyotype should be performed.

Keywords

Male, Umbilical Veins, Hydrops Fetalis, Infant, Newborn, Cardiomegaly, Echocardiography, Karyotyping, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Autopsy, Heart Atria, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!