Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of CIE lab, CIEDE 2000, and DIN 99 color differences between various shades of resin composites.

Authors: Yong-Keun, Lee; John M, Powers;

Comparison of CIE lab, CIEDE 2000, and DIN 99 color differences between various shades of resin composites.

Abstract

In addition to the CIE Lab color-difference formula (deltaE*ab), advanced formulas that include weighting functions have been introduced. The objectives of this study were to determine the correlations in color differences between different shade pairs of resin composites by different color formulas, and to determine whether the weighting functions included in the advanced formulas influenced the color-difference values.Color was measured after polymerization of two resin composites in 26 shades, and color differences between shades were calculated by deltaE*ab, CIEDE 2000 (deltaE00), and DIN 99 (deltaE99) formulas. Regression analyses were performed between the color differences calculated by three formulas in each group divided by the differences in color parametric factors between the pairs compared.There were significant correlations between deltaEab and deltaE00, deltaEab and deltaE99, and deltaE99 and deltaE00 (r2 = .99, .89, and .90, respectively). The weighting functions in the CIEDE 2000 formula had influence on deltaE00 values when differences in chroma and hue between compared pairs were great.Differences in parametric factors between the pairs compared influenced the correlation between deltaE*ab and deltaE99 values (r2 = .25 to .97). As the CIEDE 2000 formula has been proven to be better matched to observer responses and showed significant involvement of weighting functions compared to CIE Lab color difference, this formula should be considered for evaluation of the color of resin composites.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Boron Compounds, Surface Properties, Silicates, Color, Composite Resins, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymethacrylic Acids, Barium, Strontium, Materials Testing, Humans, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Colorimetry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!