
Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk for chromosome abnormalities is routinely undertaken by karyotype analysis. While karyotype analysis remains the standard method to detect structural and copy number changes of chromosomes, it requires prolonged cell culture resulting in average reporting times of about two weeks. To relieve parental anxiety, and improve the quality and plasticity of pregnancy management, rapid methods, such as FISH and QF-PCR have recently been developed. These procedures are capable of detecting > 70% of chromosome abnormalities, and deliver a reliable diagnosis within 24 hours. Here we compare and discuss the advantages and limits of these rapid assays, and position them into a broader ethical context.
Chromosome Aberrations, Time Factors, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Chromosome Aberrations, Time Factors, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
