Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: from FISH to QF-PCR].

Authors: Bernard, Conrad; Frédérique, Bena; Sophie, Dahoun-Hadorn;

[Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: from FISH to QF-PCR].

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk for chromosome abnormalities is routinely undertaken by karyotype analysis. While karyotype analysis remains the standard method to detect structural and copy number changes of chromosomes, it requires prolonged cell culture resulting in average reporting times of about two weeks. To relieve parental anxiety, and improve the quality and plasticity of pregnancy management, rapid methods, such as FISH and QF-PCR have recently been developed. These procedures are capable of detecting > 70% of chromosome abnormalities, and deliver a reliable diagnosis within 24 hours. Here we compare and discuss the advantages and limits of these rapid assays, and position them into a broader ethical context.

Keywords

Chromosome Aberrations, Time Factors, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!