Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ South African Medica...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

The role of obstetric factors in determining fetal viability.

Authors: M A, Vansteenkiste; R C, Pattinson; G F, Kirsten;

The role of obstetric factors in determining fetal viability.

Abstract

To study the influence of primary obstetric complications on the survival and short-term morbidity rates of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) babies.A 1-year retrospective, descriptive study.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital, CP.257 women admitted with live singleton fetuses and who eventually delivered babies with birth weights ranging from 750 to 1,499 g.Primary obstetric complications responsible for the delivery of the VLBW babies were clinically diagnosed. Active management was undertaken if the fetus was viable and obstetric and neonatal resuscitation were applied. Management was conservative when the fetus was considered non-viable. This decision on the initial treatment option was taken by the obstetrician who managed the case.Survival and short-term morbidity rates of the babies.Spontaneous preterm labour (45%) and hypertensive disorders (39%) were equally responsible for delivery of VLBW babies at Tygerberg Hospital. The only obstetric factor influencing the babies' outcome, however, was the initial management decision by the obstetrician. There was a survival rate of 160/213 (75.1%) in the actively managed group compared with only 1/44 (2.3%) in the conservatively managed group. Other factors that significantly influenced neonatal survival of VLBW babies were: birth weight, gestational age, Apgar score at 5 minutes and length of time between admission to hospital and the delivery.The obstetric complication responsible for delivery of the VLBW baby did not influence the survival rate. The major determinant of neonatal survival was the obstetrician's decision to manage the fetus either actively or conservatively. It seems that the outcome of VLBW babies is influenced primarily by the intrinsic characteristics of the neonates' gestational age, birth weight and condition at birth, and not the reason for delivery.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Delivery, Obstetric, Fetal Viability, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
gold