
It is almost universally agreed that there is a variety of terminology currently used for the classification of intraepithelial squamous lesions of the cervix and vulva, which in some instances is ambiguous. The optimal management and welfare of patients with such lesions requires a language accepted and readily understood among gynaecologists, cytopathologists and dermatologists. Moreover, a common system of terminology will encourage standardization and comparability of reports on an international and interdisciplinary basis. This communication studies: (a) the existing systems of terminology and the problems associated with them; (b) the new concepts of precancerous lesions and their relation to the natural history, pathogenesis and treatment; (c) the need to establish a common language between specialists. It is concluded that despite the fact that for the moment there is no perfect system of nomenclature, the recent effort made by experts to adopt an international system for reporting should be supported.
Vulvar Neoplasms, Terminology as Topic, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Epithelium
Vulvar Neoplasms, Terminology as Topic, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Epithelium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
