
Laboratory test's diagnostic performances are generally estimated by means of their sensibility, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. Unfortunately, these indices reflect only imperfectly the capacity of a test to correctly classify subjects into clinically relevant subgroups. The appeal to ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve appears as a tool of choice for this evaluation. Used in the medical domain since the 60s, ROC curve is a graphic representation of the relation existing between the sensibility and the specificity of a test, calculated for all possible cut-off. It allows the determination and the comparison of the diagnostic performances of several tests. It is also used to consider the optimal cut-off of a test, by taking into account epidemiological and medical - economic data of the disease. Used in numerous medical domains, this statistical tool is easily accessible thanks to the development of computer softwares. This article exposes the principles of construction and exploitation of a ROC curve.
Male, Internet, Likelihood Functions, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Health Status, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics, Nonparametric, Diagnosis, Differential, ROC Curve, Predictive Value of Tests, Diagnosis, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Female, False Negative Reactions, Software
Male, Internet, Likelihood Functions, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Health Status, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics, Nonparametric, Diagnosis, Differential, ROC Curve, Predictive Value of Tests, Diagnosis, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Female, False Negative Reactions, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
