Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of Hektoen and Salmonella-Shigella agar on 6033 stools of human origin submitted for routine isolation of Salmonella sp. and Shigella sp.

Authors: D M, Poisson; B, Niocel; S, Florence; D, Imbault;

Comparison of Hektoen and Salmonella-Shigella agar on 6033 stools of human origin submitted for routine isolation of Salmonella sp. and Shigella sp.

Abstract

From 1989 through 1991, 6033 stool specimens from patients at Orleans Hospital (France), were cultured for enteric pathogens. Hektoen agar (HE) was compared with Salmonella-Shigella agar (SS) after direct streaking and after overnight enrichment in Mueller-Kauffmann broth. Yersinia strains were not computed. Seven strains of Salmonella serotype Typhi were isolated, on both media, and excluded from computations for discussed reasons. Out of a total of 9 Shigella strains, HE isolated 9 and SS isolated 7. No statistically significant difference appeared about isolation of non-Typhi Salmonella strains (127 vs 114 from direct streaking, 237 vs 243 after enrichment). Predictive values of suspicious colonies were not statistically different. Numbers of false positives were not different, except for black centred colonies of the direct streaking (231 on HE vs 186 on SS, p less than 0.05). The skill of technologists was not taken into account but was found likely to be more accurate on SS agar. This data suggest that, since the frequency of Shigella sp became much lower, the differential of efficiency of HE vs SS agar is no longer obvious in human medical routine.

Keywords

Bacteriological Techniques, In Vitro Techniques, Salmonella typhi, Culture Media, Agar, Feces, Salmonella, Salmonella Infections, Humans, Shigella, Dysentery, Bacillary

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!