Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Emergency Cesarean section--analysis of 143 emergency sections].

Authors: C T, Beck; H, Klingemann; W, Dallacker; B, Dräger;

[Emergency Cesarean section--analysis of 143 emergency sections].

Abstract

Since compromises must be accepted in emergency Caesarean sections in respect of preparation, anaesthesia and hygienic standards, 143 emergency caesarean sections out of a total number of 37,583 deliveries were analysed during 1981-1990 from four different obstetrical departments as well as risks, complications, maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality were studied. In connection with these operations, which are not influenced only by medical factors but also by logistics, two mothers died (1.4%). Perinatal mortality was 3.3% (unpurified perinatal mortality: 8.5%). Neither the influence of time, when the Caesarean section was performed, nor the place of operation (theatre or labor bed), nor the indication for the operation on foetal outcome and maternal morbidity were found. Maternal morbidity was mainly contributed to pre- and intraoperative bleeding. Intraoperatively 12.6% and postoperatively 10.5% of the patients had to be given heterologous blood conserves. In more than a third of the newborn, which had been delivered by emergency Caesarean section, because of a pathological cardiotocogram, the pH values showed no pathological findings. The benefit of an antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency Caesarean sections could be significantly demonstrated, showing the different rates of secondary healing complications. A particular problem exists in emergency Caesarean sections for the delivery of the second twin following spontaneous delivery of the first one (2.8%).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Cesarean Section, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Fetal Distress, Obstetric Labor Complications, Survival Rate, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Germany, Apgar Score, Humans, Female, Emergencies, Fetal Monitoring

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!