Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Ratio of plasma fluoxetine to norfluoxetine concentrations and associated sedation.

Authors: P E, Keck; S L, McElroy;

Ratio of plasma fluoxetine to norfluoxetine concentrations and associated sedation.

Abstract

Sedation is an often unanticipated but clinically significant side effect in some patients treated with fluoxetine. To date, no clinical or pharmacokinetic factors have been identified in association with sedation in fluoxetine-treated patients. We hypothesized that patients experiencing sedation might have elevated plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and/or norfluoxetine compared with patients without sedation.Plasma samples from eight patients reporting new-onset sedation following initiation of treatment with fluoxetine and from 14 consecutive patients also receiving fluoxetine but who experienced no sedation were analyzed for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations.Patients in the two groups did not differ significantly in age, sex distribution, diagnoses, mean dose or duration of fluoxetine treatment, or mean combined plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. However, the plasma ratio of fluoxetine to norfluoxetine was less than 1.0 in all patients reporting sedation and greater than 1.0 in all patients without sedation. Also, there was a significant difference between the mean +/- SD ratio of fluoxetine-to-norfluoxetine plasma concentrations in the group reporting sedation (0.6 +/- 0.1) and the group without sedation (1.7 +/- 0.8).The results of this study suggest an association between sedation and increased plasma concentrations of norfluoxetine compared with fluoxetine. Individuals reporting sedation may metabolize the parent drug differently than patients who do not experience sedation, leading to a relative increase in the proportion of the active metabolite, norfluoxetine.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Depressive Disorder, Fluoxetine, Humans, Female, Sleep Stages, Bulimia, Sleep, Drug Administration Schedule

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!