
pmid: 15632707
handle: 11585/41629
I read the article by Tanaka et al.1 that was recently published in Pancreas with interest. Although their report is preliminary, the authors have made an important point that I hope will be confirmed in a more extensive group of patients: that periodic screening abdominal ultrasound may be useful for early detection of pancreatic cancer. In this connection I would like to point out that in a recent multicenter study of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors2 we showed that in 64 (34.8%) of the 184 patients studied the tumor was discovered incidentally by abdominal ultrasound performed as part of a routine check-up of asymptomatic individuals. Patients in the group of 64 had significantly fewer metastases as well as significantly greater survival as compared with the 120 symptomatic patients (p= 0.0043). From these results we concluded that abdominal pancreatic ultrasound should be performed every 1 to 2 years in all individuals over the age of fifty, especially in view of the fact that it is such a simple and unexpensive technique. We all know that early diagnosis is still our best defense against tumors, so if this can be done with a test as simple and cheap as ultrasound, there is no good reason not to do it.
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Early Diagnosis, Humans, PANCREATIC CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Ultrasonography
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Early Diagnosis, Humans, PANCREATIC CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
