Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Surgery for aortic valve disease with congenital bicuspid aortic valve].

Authors: Kenji, Osaka; M, Kamada; S, Nagamine; H, Kakihata;

[Surgery for aortic valve disease with congenital bicuspid aortic valve].

Abstract

From January 1998 to December 2002, a total of 120 patients underwent aortic valve surgery at our institution. Of these, 26 patients (22%) had congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Main valvular lesion of BAV was aortic valve stenosis (AS) in 17 and regurgitation (AR) in 9. There was no significant difference in the aortic annular size between BAV and non-BAV cases measured by echocardiography preoperatively [22.8 +/- 2.0 mm versus 22.5 +/- 2.2 mm in AS (NS), and 25.4 +/- 2.4 mm versus 23.4 +/- 2.5 mm in AR (NS)]. At operation, however, supraannular type prosthetic valve was selected more frequently in BAV than in non-BAV because of the difficulty of implanting the proper size prosthetic valve in annular position in BAV [10/25 (40%) in BAV versus 18/91 (20%) in non-BAV (p < 0.05)]. Moreover, ascending aortic dimension in BAV cases was significantly larger than in non-BAV cases [43.7 +/- 7.3 mm versus 39.6 +/- 7.3 mm (p<0.05)]. These features were more prominent in non-raphe BAV cases. These results suggested that operative procedure including prosthetic valve selection needs careful consideration in BAV especially no-raphe patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Male, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Middle Aged, Aortic Valve, Humans, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!