Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Occlusion of dentin tubules by desensitizing agents.

Authors: Adriana Franco, Paes Leme; José Carlos Rohrer Gabriel, dos Santos; Marcelo, Giannini; Ronaldo Seichi, Wada;

Occlusion of dentin tubules by desensitizing agents.

Abstract

To evaluate the occluding effect of five desensitizing agents on human dentin tubules.30 buccal and lingual surfaces were prepared from 15 extracted intact third molars. Each surface was polished with aluminum oxide abrasive papers to remove enamel and to expose the underlying dentin in cervical area. The flat dentin surfaces were treated with 0.5 M EDTA for 2 minutes to expose dentin tubule orifices. The samples were randomly divided into six groups: AS - immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 2 weeks (control); OX - Oxagel (monopotassium oxalate), DU - Duraphat (sodium fluoride), DE - Desensibilize (strontium chloride), OD - Odahcam (acidulated phosphate fluoride) and SE - Sensodyne (strontium chloride + calcium carbonate abrasive). Dentin desensitizers were applied during 2 weeks and after each application the samples were kept in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The samples were prepared according to the scanning electron microscope procedures and were examined at x2000 magnification.The results were expressed in percent (%) of tubule occlusion and analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0.05): AS- 45.41 +/- 11.65a; OX- 42.65 +/- 11.79a; DU- 47.25 +/- 8.59ab; DE- 49.36 +/- 18.27ab; OD- 64.43 +/- 15.55b and SE- 65.44 +/- 10.93b. Results suggest that the dentin surfaces treated with OD and SE showed higher tubule occlusion when compared to AS and OX, but were not different compared to DU and DE treatments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Analysis of Variance, Oxalates, Dentin Sensitivity, Molar, Statistics, Nonparametric, Calcium Carbonate, Dentinal Fluid, Dentin Permeability, Drug Combinations, Strontium, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride, Humans, Sodium Fluoride, Fluorides, Topical

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!