Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Controlled clinical testing of an antidiarrheal].

Authors: M, Dorn;

[Controlled clinical testing of an antidiarrheal].

Abstract

To identify the efficacy and tolerance of activated charcoal in acute, nonspecific diarrhea.Randomized, double-blind study on 100 adults with nonspecific diarrhea, performed in two general practices. 94 were included in the final analysis, 6 patients - all from the placebo group abandoned treatment because of the absence of an effect.The major outcome parameters - reduction of stool frequency and curtailment of the duration of the diarrhea - were unequivocally achieved. Differences between the agent and placebo were great. Stool frequency decreased significantly from the third day in the drug group, and highly significantly from the fourth day. The superiority of the antidiarrheal was also clearly evident in terms of the numbers of days with diarrhea, the clinical findings tympania, nature of the stool and of eight individual symptoms, the summed score of which was improved highly significantly by the test substance.The substance tested proved rapidly and reliably effective in the treatment of nonspecific diarrhea, and was well tolerated. Activated charcoal, together with oral rehydration, can therefore be recommended as an initial measure for treating diarrhea with the aim of rapidly and effectively preventing loss of fluid and electrolytes and relieving symptoms.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Diarrhea, Time Factors, Middle Aged, Placebos, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction, Germany, Charcoal, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Female, Antidiarrheals, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?