
To compare the Tono-Pen tonometer with the Goldmann applanation and assess the precision and accuracy of the Tono-Pen tonometer.62 cases (111 eyes) were random measured with the Tono-Pen tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.Overall we found that 74.8% of the Tono-Pen readings were within +/- 2 mmHg of the Goldmann applanation readings and 83.8% were within +/- 3 mmHg. The correlation coefficient between the readings of the two instruments was 0.865. The mean value of the paired differences was (-0.51 +/- 2.24)mmHg in the 9 to 30 mmHg interval.The Tono-Pen tonometer measures intraocular pressure in a manner that corresponds well to the Goldmann applanation tonometer, especially in the 9 - 30 mmHg interval. But this tonometer may overestimate the intraocular pressure in eyes with low intraocular pressure, and underestimate the intraocular pressure in eyes with high intraocular pressure.
Adult, Male, Tonometry, Ocular, Adolescent, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Child, Intraocular Pressure, Aged
Adult, Male, Tonometry, Ocular, Adolescent, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Child, Intraocular Pressure, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
