Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Appropriateness of tympanostomy tubes.

Authors: P, Spilseth;

Appropriateness of tympanostomy tubes.

Abstract

We identified 38 children who had tympanostomy tubes placed during a one-year period. We used appropriateness criteria and retrospective medical record review to determine if tympanostomy tube placement was appropriate or inappropriate. We asked parents for outcome information about their child 12 months after tubes were placed. We counted ENT-related clinic visits for 12 months before tubes and 12 months after tubes. The results showed that 20 of 38 (53%) patients were referred appropriately for tubes. One year after the procedure, 95% of parents felt their child was better. The appropriate groups had an average of 9.05 ear-related clinic visits in the year before tubes and 4.80 visits in the year after tubes. The inappropriate group had an average of 7.44 ear-related visits in the year before tubes and 5.17 visits in the year after surgery. Although this difference is not statistically significant at 95% confidence interval, it suggests a relationship of less resource utilization for those with appropriate tube placement, but little change for those placed inappropriately.

Keywords

Male, Child Welfare, Health Maintenance Organizations, Physicians, Family, Combined Modality Therapy, Middle Ear Ventilation, Regional Health Planning, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Otitis Media, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Hearing Disorders, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!