Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Médica de Ch...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancer].

Authors: Xabier, de Aretxabala; Héctor, Losada; Javier, Mora; Iván, Roa; Luis, Burgos; Eduardo, Yáñez; Ingrid, Quijada; +1 Authors

[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in gallbladder cancer].

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer is generally associated with a poor prognosis, being local recurrence the main pattern of failure.To evaluate neoadjuvant chemoradiation as a means to improve the prognosis in gallbladder cancer.Twenty three gallbladder cancer patients were prospectively treated between June 1993 and September 1999 in the Temuco Regional Hospital. Eighteen (82%) patients had subserosal infiltration, while three (13%) had serosal and two (9%) adipose tissue infiltration. Chemotherapy was done with 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion during 5 days at day 1 and 28 of treatment. Radiotherapy consisted in a total dose of 4500 cGy, divided in 25 sessions. Patients' survival was compared with a series of 19 patients not subjected to chemoradiation, formerly treated at the institution.Twenty patients had hematological problems secondary to the therapy. Leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common toxic effects and eight had leucopenia under 2.0 x 10(3) during the treatment course. Chemoradiation delayed surgical treatment in eight patients. After the chemoradiation protocol, seven patients were excluded from surgical treatment and 14 patients underwent resection. Three of the latter (11%) had liver involvement and four (14%) had lymph node involvement. Among the patients who underwent resection, five are still alive with a follow up of 43.8 months. Treated patients had a worst actuarial survival than subjects not treated with chemoradiation.In this series of patients chemoradiation had no positive effect and a potentially detrimental effect in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Humans, Female, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil, Prospective Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research