
In this in-vitro study, the flexural strength and Young's-modulus of five resin-based provisional materials were compared after repair. A three-point bending test and a fracture test of 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were performed. Temphase (53.1 +/- 7.9 MPa), Luxatemp (45.2 +/- 7.8 MPa) and Trim (17.8 +/- 2.5 MPa) showed significantly lower initial flexural strength compared to Provipont (54.3 +/- 10.5 MPa) and Protemp 3 Garant (58.9 +- 5.9 MPa). A significant decrease of flexural strength was found after the repair of Luxatemp and Temphase with provisional material on the oxygen-inhibited surface, and additionally, for Temphase with composite on mill-cut surface. The fracture strength of the FPDs varied between 655N for Trim and 1258N for Protemp3. After the repair, the results did not change significantly. The effectiveness of the repair using temporary materials was highly dependent on the type of material and the repair material. However, the repair of the FPDs with provisional resin may lead to minor changes in the fracture resistance. The high flexural strength and fracture resistance would favor Protemp3 and Provipont for long term clinical application.
Dental Stress Analysis, Analysis of Variance, Denture, Partial, Temporary, Acrylic Resins, Denture Repair, Composite Resins, Elasticity, Polymethacrylic Acids, Materials Testing, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Pliability
Dental Stress Analysis, Analysis of Variance, Denture, Partial, Temporary, Acrylic Resins, Denture Repair, Composite Resins, Elasticity, Polymethacrylic Acids, Materials Testing, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Pliability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
