Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers.

Authors: Martin, Rosentritt; Michael, Behr; Reinhold, Lang; Gerhard, Handel;

Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers.

Abstract

In this in-vitro study, the flexural strength and Young's-modulus of five resin-based provisional materials were compared after repair. A three-point bending test and a fracture test of 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were performed. Temphase (53.1 +/- 7.9 MPa), Luxatemp (45.2 +/- 7.8 MPa) and Trim (17.8 +/- 2.5 MPa) showed significantly lower initial flexural strength compared to Provipont (54.3 +/- 10.5 MPa) and Protemp 3 Garant (58.9 +- 5.9 MPa). A significant decrease of flexural strength was found after the repair of Luxatemp and Temphase with provisional material on the oxygen-inhibited surface, and additionally, for Temphase with composite on mill-cut surface. The fracture strength of the FPDs varied between 655N for Trim and 1258N for Protemp3. After the repair, the results did not change significantly. The effectiveness of the repair using temporary materials was highly dependent on the type of material and the repair material. However, the repair of the FPDs with provisional resin may lead to minor changes in the fracture resistance. The high flexural strength and fracture resistance would favor Protemp3 and Provipont for long term clinical application.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dental Stress Analysis, Analysis of Variance, Denture, Partial, Temporary, Acrylic Resins, Denture Repair, Composite Resins, Elasticity, Polymethacrylic Acids, Materials Testing, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Methacrylates, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate, Pliability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!