Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparison of preoperative retinometer values with postoperative visual acuity after surgery of epiretinal membranes].

Authors: C, Leisser; G, Bartl;

[Comparison of preoperative retinometer values with postoperative visual acuity after surgery of epiretinal membranes].

Abstract

We report about our clinical experience when comparing the preoperative retinometer values with the postoperative visual acuity after microsurgical excision of epiretinal membranes (ERM).Pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling was performed in 56 eyes of 53 patients. Preoperatively, we obtained the distant and near visual acuity and the retinometer value. Postoperatively, we compared the preoperative retinometer value to the best postoperative visual acuity.The preoperative retinometer value was in 39 eyes (70 %) equal to the best postoperative distant visual acuity (+/- 1 line) and in 34 eyes (61 %) equal to the best near visual acuity (+/- 1 line). A difference of + 2 or - 2 lines or more from the retinometer value was found in 17 eyes (30 %) for the best postoperative distant visual acuity and in 22 eyes (39 %) for the best near visual acuity. 49 eyes (87.5 %) had a better visual acuity after pars plana vitrectomy, 6 eyes (10.7 %) had equal visual acuities and one eye (1,8 %) was worse than the preoperative visual acuity. The average improvement of vision after the operation was + 2.5 lines for the distant and + 2.4 lines for the near visual acuity.The preoperative retinometer examination is a precise method for obtaining the visual acuity of patients selected for pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling. Uncertain results can be achieved in eyes with very opaque ERM and ERM with macular edema.

Keywords

Male, Postoperative Care, Microsurgery, Patient Selection, Vision Tests, Visual Acuity, Reproducibility of Results, Epiretinal Membrane, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Treatment Outcome, Retinal Diseases, Vitrectomy, Preoperative Care, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!