
"Wavefront correction" has become an often used concept in refractive surgery, even though it is not always uniquely defined. Clinical results, however, are lagging behind the original expectations.The physical items wavefront error, light ray, ray tracing and refraction error first have to be well defined, including demonstration of the applicability of the underlying model assumptions. In our simulations optical errors of the eye are expressed in three different ways: two-dimensional refraction error maps, error maps of optical path lengths, and blurred images on the retina.Optical errors are completely correctable only at the locations where they originally occur, i. e., corneal errors at the cornea, lens errors in the lens. Correction at another localization always introduces new errors. Other than in astronomical telescopes, the correction of optical path length errors in the human eye is already limited by short time-scale fluctuations of the relevant parameters which are two orders of magnitude beyond the tolerable error limits. Approximation of the optical path length error by a series expansion (e. g., Zernike polynomials) can induce additional errors.The worse the optical properties of an eye are, the less is the wavefront approach applicable for correction.
Cornea, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Refractive Errors, Models, Biological, Refractive Surgical Procedures
Cornea, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Refractive Errors, Models, Biological, Refractive Surgical Procedures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
