
The patient with a patent, infected vascular graft presents a dilemma to the surgeon, who must decide whether revascularization is necessary in addition to removal of the infected graft. When a graft infection points superficially or requires drainage, the graft may be well enough exposed to provide easy access. A technique to determine preoperatively the need for revascularization in two patients with patent, exposed grafts is discussed. Following therapeutic anticoagulation, the exposed grafts were occluded with a screw clamp. Within 1 hour, one patient developed ischemic rest pain, associated with a fall in ankle blood pressure to < 60 mm Hg. Consequently, the patient underwent excision of the infected graft and revascularization with another extraanatomic bypass graft. The second patient, who had moderate intermittent claudication, tolerated clamping of the graft without ischemic symptoms at rest. Revascularization was performed through noninfected tissue, with the knowledge that the graft could be removed if necessary, without causing ischemic rest pain. This technique helps to determine preoperatively whether patients with exposed, infected grafts require revascularization as well as graft excision.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
