Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Uropathogenic Escherichia coli--ExPEC pathotype, the best characterized].

Authors: Codruţa-Romaniţa, Usein; Maria, Damian;

[Uropathogenic Escherichia coli--ExPEC pathotype, the best characterized].

Abstract

Uropathogenic E. coli strains are included in the recently defined pathotype ExPEC together with other E. coli isolates involved in various extraintestinal infections. These strains possess specific virulence factors such as adherence systems, toxins, iron uptake systems that distinguish them from the commensal strains. The expression of bacterial adherence structures requires a complex organization which involves a different number of proteins depending upon the assembly in fimbrial protrudings or afimbrial aggregates. However one could notice that their genetic determinants are usually similar. The toxins synthetized by ExPEC strains, mainly represented by hemolysin and cytotoxic necrotizing factor contribute to destruction of eukaryotic cells. Such siderophores as aerobactin confer the strains the advantage of capturing iron from the environment in which they must survive and replicate. Co-expression of virulence factors contributes to the host's defence system defeat and onset of infection. Quite often the codifying genes are localized in distinctive regions on the bacterial chromosome called pathogenicity-associated islands. The horizontal transfer of these DNA blocks among individuals belonging to the same species is one of the processes involved in the evolution of pathogenic strains.

Keywords

Adhesins, Escherichia coli, Hemolysin Proteins, Escherichia coli Proteins, Fimbriae, Bacterial, Urinary Tract Infections, Escherichia coli, Humans, Serotyping, Bacterial Adhesion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!