Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The quality of life of patients with chronic lower limb ischemia].

Authors: K G, Balmasov; Iu I, Buziashvili; K M, Morozov; S A, Papoian;

[The quality of life of patients with chronic lower limb ischemia].

Abstract

Sixty-six patients with chronic lower limb ischemia (CLLI) were examined. The mean age of the patients constituted 55.98+/-7.7 (from 39 to 75 years). There were 64 (96.9%) men and 2 (3.1%) women. According to the runoff, the patients were distributed in the following way. Twenty-eight (41.8%) patients demonstrated good runoff, 23 (34.855) satisfactory, and 15 (23.2%) patients had poor runoff (according to the classification proposed by R.B.Rutherford). As dependent on the stage of ischemia the patients were divided into 2 groups. Twenty-eight (42.5%) patients presented with intermittent claudication (stage IIB) and 38 (57.5%) patients suffered from critical ischemia (st. III-IV). The quality of life (QL), was assessed using a SF-36 questionnaire and a questionnaire for patients with CLLI. After vascular reconstruction the QL of patients with infrainguinal artery lesion remained significantly low according to the majority of parameters as compared to the normal population. However, comparatively to the preoperative parameters, the QL after operation was significantly improved in all the indicators. The QL of patients with a clinical improvement after operation significantly differed from that in the patient group with a history of unsuccessful operation. In the long-term period, the QL of patients with bypass thrombosis was considerably worse in all the parameters than in patients with patent bypasses. As for the parameters of both questionnaires, the QL of patients with an amputated lower limb was appreciably worse than in patients with saved limbs.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Hemodynamics, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Lower Extremity, Ischemia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chronic Disease, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!