Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evaluation of resistance in Amaranthus quitensis Kunth populations to imazethapyr and other imidazolinones.

Authors: C, Casado; M D, Osuna; R, De Prado;

Evaluation of resistance in Amaranthus quitensis Kunth populations to imazethapyr and other imidazolinones.

Abstract

Six populations of Amaranthus quitensis (R1, R3-R7), taken from soybean fields in Córdoba (Argentina), continuously treated with imazethapyr escaped from control with this herbicide. In order to characterize this resistance, whole plant assays were carried out using imazethapyr. Treatments were made at different doses, from 0.5 g a.i.ha(-1) to 60 g a.i.ha(-1), at 200 1 ha(-1) and 200 kPa pressure. Shoot fresh weight was mesured 21 days after treatment. The results were expressed as resistance factor (ED50(R)/ED50(S)). Different degrees of resistance were found as its shown by the respective resistance factors: R1:22.5, R3:6.5, R4:43.1, R5:8.6, R6:4, R7:5. Due to the high variability in the response to imazethapyr treatments shown in some populations, and according to previous investigations on the ALS gene that proved heterozygosity a screening was made, at the recommended dose of imazethapyr. Plants were classified according to their state, dead, alive and affected (fallen but alive). Populations 3, 6 and 7 showed an important heterozygosity. Furthermore, in order to evaluate the existance of a possible cross-resistance, the recommended doses of 4 other imidazolinones (imazametabenz, imazapyr, imazamox, imazaquin) were applied to the plants. All populations were susceptible to both imazamox and imazapyr and showed cross-resistance to imazamethabenz and imazaquin.

Keywords

Heterozygote, Amaranthus, Nicotinic Acids, Immunity, Innate, Plant Shoots

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!