
The objectives and limitations in the prescription and construction of leg length adjustments are reviewed. The functional and structural significance of differences in leg length for patients and for healthy persons in different age groups and in different growth phases is considered. A few unconventional ideas, and some information and personal and environmental characteristics are described, leading to a discussion of care criteria that go further than the more usual care systems. It is stressed that interdisciplinary care makes it absolutely essential to note what system of measurement is being used when the treatment is prescribed. Attention is drawn to the possibility of using electrophysiological measurements--whether in the doctor's or physiotherapist's practice or in the orthopedic workshop--for monitoring. Unchanged biomechanical and orthopedic positions are shown in sketches.
Orthotic Devices, Muscles, Humans, Joints, Gait, Biomechanical Phenomena, Leg Length Inequality, Shoes
Orthotic Devices, Muscles, Humans, Joints, Gait, Biomechanical Phenomena, Leg Length Inequality, Shoes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
