Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evidence of the radical prostatectomy Gleason score in the biopsy Gleason score].

Authors: F, Algaba Arrea; A, Chivite de León; J M, Santaularia Segura; A, Oliver Samper;

[Evidence of the radical prostatectomy Gleason score in the biopsy Gleason score].

Abstract

The Gleason score (Gs) for prostatic cancer has a good prognosis correlation after radical prostatectomy, for this reason its correlation with the Gs in the biopsy can be useful.Two hundred fifteen patients with blind evaluation among three pathologists of their Gs in biopsy and in the corresponding radical prostatectomy specimen are presented.The exact coincidence is present in 49.7% of cases, 38.6% of cases are under graded in the biopsy and 11.6% of them over graded in the biopsy. No cases of Gs 2 in the biopsy are found. Any case with Gs 3 and 4 in the biopsy are reproduced in the radical prostatectomy specimen. The exact coincidence for biopsy Gs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are 25%, 45%, 72.7%, 36.6% and 60% respectively (kappa 0.32 +/- 0.047, p<0.0001 in Gs 5 to 8). The Gleason pattern 4 is the less diagnosed in prostate biopsies [40% of cases with this pattern in the excision specimen it is missing in the biopsy).The Gs in the needle prostatic biopsy has a good correspondence with the Gs in the radical prostatectomy specimen. For an increase of the reproducibility it is recommendable avoid the diagnosis of Gs 2, 3 and 4 in biopsy and a scrupulous search for the patterns 4 and 5.

Keywords

Male, Prostatectomy, Biopsy, Needle, Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!