Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Operative treatment of kidney calculi].

Authors: N K, Dzeranov; E K, Ianenko;

[Operative treatment of kidney calculi].

Abstract

262 cases of coral nephrolithiasis (CN) treated for the last 5 years (mean age 51.6 years) have been analysed. Of them, 46 (17.9%) patients have undergone 2 to 4 operations, 14 (5.4%) patients had bilateral nephrolithiasis. Open surgical interventions (section nephrolithotomy, pyelonephrolithotomy) were performed in 31 and 106 patients, respectively. All of them had a severe form K-3 or K-4. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotrophy (ESWL) was conducted in 72 (27.5%) patients with coral concrements K-1, K-2. 'Mean number of the procedures per a stone was 4.2. Transcutaneous puncture nephrolithotripsy (TPNT) was made in 53 (20.2%) patients (K-2, K-3). The results of the treatment were assessed at discharge and 12 months after it. The efficacy of the treatment was judged by completeness of the stone elimination, postoperative complications and interventions to correct these complications. Open operations eliminated the stones completely in 71.2% patients, in combination with ESWL--in 91.6%, TPNT--in 78%, in combination with ESWL--in 94.5%. Efficacy of ESWL as monotherapy + stent reached 68.1%. Open operations entailed complications in 41.6% (of them 68.5% in section nephrolithotomy), TPNT--in 18.2%, ESWL--in 16.3%. Coral nephrolithiasis should be treated by skilled specialists in clinics furnished with modern facilities, combination of which minimizes traumatic complications and raises treatment efficacy.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Kidney Calculi, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Adolescent, Lithotripsy, Humans, Infant, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!