
Previous studies of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) have examined its use in several clinical settings, but no study to date has been specific to emergency medicine. This article examines the use of OMT in the practice of emergency medicine by osteopathic physicians. Osteopathic physicians who identified their practice as emergency medicine were surveyed to determine OMT use, including techniques used, graduate medical education, and factors affecting usage. Use of OMT was common (55%), with a large minority (28%) of osteopathic physicians reporting daily or weekly usage. Techniques most often used include soft tissue treatment, high velocity/low amplitude treatment, and muscle energy treatment. Factors affecting usage include residency training, undergraduate medical experiences, and practice environment. These findings indicate that further investigation into the indications and efficacy of OMT in emergency medicine is warranted.
Adult, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Internship and Residency, Manipulation, Osteopathic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Education, Medical, Graduate, Health Care Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Female, Curriculum, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Treatment
Adult, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Internship and Residency, Manipulation, Osteopathic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Education, Medical, Graduate, Health Care Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Female, Curriculum, Emergency Service, Hospital, Emergency Treatment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
