Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Emergency Cesarean section--basic data].

Authors: V M, Roemer; G, Heger-Römermann;

[Emergency Cesarean section--basic data].

Abstract

Performing a computerized multicenter-study of 66 clinics in the state of North-Rhine-Westfalia concerning the management of emergency caesarean-section (ECS), the resulting basic data were calculated as follows: In 207 cases of ECS studied, the time period needed from the decision for operation on to the beginning of surgery (DFOS) is on the average 20.4 +/- 12.3 minutes (Median 17 min., 90th Percentile 37 min.). The mere duration of surgery until delivery of the baby averaged to 4.4 +/- 2.1 min. (Median 4.0 min., 90th Percentile 7 min.). In an emergency case, on the average 24.8 +/- 12.9 minutes (Median 22 min., 90th Centile 43 min.) pass by from the decision for the operation until delivery. The median actual pH-value in umbilical artery blood of these neonates was 7.169 +/- 0.160 (N = 168). 25.0% of these neonates had pH-values below 7.1, 16.0% below 7.0 and 3.0% below 6.900. 20.1% of these babies had an Apgar-score of less than or equal to 3 after 1 min., 4 newborns received a score of 0, but recovered, whereas 4 other demised. The unpurified perinatal mortality amounted to 53.1/1000, the purified one to 48.3/1000. From these data we conclude for the time being, that 1. efforts have to be made to shorten the time factors (especially the first one (DFOS)), although there is still no evidence, that severe neonatal acidosis is significantly associated with undue long time factors in ECS; 2. further thorough analysis is need to evaluate the medical profile and the organizational background of these highest risk-deliveries.

Keywords

Asphyxia Neonatorum, Time Factors, Cesarean Section, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Fetal Distress, Pregnancy, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Computer Graphics, Humans, Female, Emergencies, Software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!