Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Computer-assisted image interpretation: use of a neural network to differentiate tubular carcinoma from sclerosing adenosis.

Authors: T J, O'Leary; U V, Mikel; R L, Becker;

Computer-assisted image interpretation: use of a neural network to differentiate tubular carcinoma from sclerosing adenosis.

Abstract

Measurement of nuclear and glandular size and shape features was carried out on 18 cases of sclerosing adenosis and 18 cases of tubular carcinoma. Modified Bonferroni analysis showed that glandular surface density and the coefficient of variation of luminal form factor were significant in discriminating between these two lesions. These two histologic features, together with the diagnosis, were used to train a neural network implementing a backpropagation algorithm. Following training, the network correctly classified 33 of the 36 cases in the training set (92%). Furthermore, the network correctly classified 19 of 19 cases in a test set consisting of cases that were not used to train the network. These results suggest that neural networks may be useful to assist in the differential diagnosis of histologically similar lesions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Sclerosis, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Adenocarcinoma, Fibrocystic Breast Disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!